Is the BBC is Anti-Bharat and Pro-Islamist?
The BBC seem to have an anti-Bharat, but they seem to have a pro-Islamist bias also. Only two weeks ago, we found out that Jihadi bride Shamima Begum has been rewarded with a 10-part podcast.
The BBC has once again embroiled itself in controversy. This time, it has produced a two-part documentary re-evaluating the Gujarat riots of 2002 where over 1,000 people were killed, 223 missing and a further 2,500 missing. The BBC didn’t provide any new evidence or facts in the documentary so one is left wondering why they have decided to air this documentary two decades later. While we do that, let us also wonder if the BBC has an anti-Bharat bias and a pro-Islamist one.
The BBC documentary titled: India: The Modi Question was released on Tuesday 17, January. Part one of the documentary looks at the rise of Prime Minister Modi, his relationship with the right-wing Hindu organisation Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and allegations of him and his party the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have towards the world’s largest religious minority - Muslims. The documentary includes a report regarding the Gujarat riots that was not released previously.
The report was part of an inquiry ordered by the then foreign secretary Jack Straw. It says that "the extent of violence was much greater than reported" and "the aim of the riots was to purge Muslims from Hindu areas". The report claims that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was "directly responsible" for the "climate of impunity" that enabled the violence.
If there were any weight to the evidence presented that would sway the supreme court judgment, which exonerated Narendra Modi, then why wasn’t it presented at the time, instead of two decades later? The reason why, is because the evidence in the report appears to be so tenuous that the courts would have disregarded it. Therefore, any reasonable person would conclude that resurrecting this issue now, as if all the questions regarding the Gujarat riots of 2002 were not answered by the courts 20 years ago, is nothing more than an attempt to destabilise relations between the Muslim and Hindu citizens of Bharat. This cannot be allowed to happen because it could inflame communal tensions and no one wants that.
The Barelvi cleric Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi strongly condemned the BBC documentary that talks about the poor condition of Muslims in India. He states: "Even the RSS chief has assured Muslims that they want to work hand in hand. We appreciate his statement on that. BBC should mend its ways at the earliest," the cleric said.
The BBC claim: “It was "rigorously researched" and "a wide range of voices, witnesses and experts were approached, and we have featured a range of opinions, including responses from people in the BJP".
The BBC have not added much value to the debate and it appears they have recycled old news to open up old wounds. No one benefits from this documentary, least of all the British tax payers who are seemingly frustrated with the output of the BBC. This is so much so the case that there is a grass roots campaign here in Britain to defund the BBC. You cannot watch live TV unless you purchase a TV licence, even if you don’t want to watch the BBC. So the broadcaster benefits from licence fees even though some of the public do not consume their content. This daylight robbery.
The BBC seem to have an anti-Bharat, but they seem to have a pro-Islamist bias also. Only two weeks ago, we found out that Jihadi bride Shamima Begum has been rewarded with a 10-part podcast. This individual, with two of her friends, left the comfort of Britain to join the Islamic State group in Syria. She has shown no remorse in what she did, and she is considered to be a national security threat to Britain. The extent to the threat she poses is so severe that Sajid Javid, the then Home Secretary was compelled to strip her of her citizenship. So while Shamima Begum is not allowed to return to Britain, the BBC seem fit to think it is okay to reward her with a platform on their channel. This is scandalous.
The fact of the matter is that if the BBC really had damning evidence against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, then it should have produced it at the time. But it didn’t and it still doesn’t. Instead of focusing on the internal affairs of Bharat, the BBC should stop itself from giving Islamist a platform on their channel. The British public and the citizens of Bharat would greatly appreciate it.
Begum the BBC says was the victim of grooming,and therefore should be let back into the U.K. . Firstly she knowingly planned what she was going to do ,and supported a Nazi type organisation - Isis. She committed unlawful ,barbaric acts while she was there. She didn’t try to return whilst she thought they were winning . The victims of grooming gangs in the U.K. received no help from the BBC, and indeed they actively covered it up and still are doing so .In 2013 a BBC Manchester journalist Kevin Fitzpatrick sends an email to Jim McMahon who was leader of
Oldham Labour Council at the time. It is addressed to him ,the police force, senior council leaders and Jim’s PR Carl Marsden . The email ( which is in the public domain) shows Kevin asking Jim if he can broadcast a story that he has checked out about white children being grabbed off the streets in broad daylight ,in Oldham, beaten gang raped ,drugged and prostituted . Jim does not want Kevin to broadcast it. So Jim and his PR Carl Marsden are seen in another communication a week or so after the first celebrating the fact that Kevin Fitzpatrick - the BBC journalist had decided not to publish.
Debbie Abrahams Labour MP for Oldham or as the locals call her Debbie Kashmir Abrahams is paid by the Pakistani Government , when have the BBC criticised her? The attacks on Hindus by Muslims recently in Leicester and Sandwell reporting by BBC totally skewed in favour of Muslim population.Teacher still in hiding in Batley , why is BBC not talking about it . India needs to oust Pakistan from its American alliance and form a coalition with the States itself. Whatever Modi does or doesn’t do is for the benefit of the majority, which when I looked was a Hindu majority.So whatever the BBC has to say is of no value. Since when has the BBC past comment on the increasingly poor white community( both educationally and financially) and the increasingly rich well educated Muslim community many of whom do not work and do not abide by U.K. law.